合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國保潔 |
美國強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> 納米滲吸驅(qū)油劑種類、降低界面張力和改變潤濕性的能力等機(jī)理研究（二）
> LB膜分析儀證明SP-B在肺表面活性物質(zhì)三維結(jié)構(gòu)形成中的關(guān)鍵作用
> 納米顆粒間相互作用對(duì)界面張力的影響
> 探索界面張力梯度驅(qū)動(dòng)對(duì)流轉(zhuǎn)捩規(guī)律
> 混合型烷醇酰胺復(fù)雜組成對(duì)油/水界面張力的影響規(guī)律（二）
> 懸浮床加氫工藝條件下界面張力、油品黏度模擬近似計(jì)算（一）
> GA、WPI和T80復(fù)合乳液體系的脂肪消化動(dòng)力學(xué)曲線、界面張力變化（四）
> 高溫多元合金表面張力的計(jì)算方法及裝置、設(shè)備
> 原油中活性物質(zhì)與堿作用下對(duì)界面張力的影響
> 全自動(dòng)表面張力儀的測(cè)試方法
推薦新聞Info
-
> 新型多羥基苯磺酸鹽驅(qū)油劑的界面張力優(yōu)化及油田應(yīng)用潛力分析（一）
> 基于最大氣泡壓力方法測(cè)量液態(tài)鋰錫合金表面張力
> 烷基糖苷表面活性劑界面張力與潤濕性相關(guān)性研究（二）
> 烷基糖苷表面活性劑界面張力與潤濕性相關(guān)性研究（一）
> 嵌段比例對(duì)溫敏聚合物表面張力的影響及臨界膠束濃度分析（五）
> 嵌段比例對(duì)溫敏聚合物表面張力的影響及臨界膠束濃度分析（四）
> 利用表面張力優(yōu)化浮選工藝：調(diào)整劑AY在石英-膠磷礦分離中的活性調(diào)控（二）
> 利用表面張力優(yōu)化浮選工藝：調(diào)整劑AY在石英-膠磷礦分離中的活性調(diào)控（一）
> 嵌段比例對(duì)溫敏聚合物表面張力的影響及臨界膠束濃度分析（三）
> 嵌段比例對(duì)溫敏聚合物表面張力的影響及臨界膠束濃度分析（二）
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤濕性有影響？——結(jié)論、致謝！
來源：上海謂載 瀏覽 1850 次 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-11-09
結(jié)論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué)，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時(shí)間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時(shí)。 初始潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué) 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機(jī)化合物進(jìn)入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項(xiàng)研究中，我們測(cè)試了土傳表面的影響 潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué)的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會(huì)加速潤濕過程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動(dòng)不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué)方面起主導(dǎo)作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號(hào) 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤濕性有影響？——概括、介紹
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤濕性有影響？——材料和方法